Don’t expect me to lead the world to the remains of any globe-trotting adventurers. I tend to stay on the trail, whereas the guy who triggered the Fossett plane discovery was hiking way, way off the main trails leading out of Devil’s Postpile National Monument and into the Minarets country of the High Sierra. (By the way, the picture above is not from the Sierra; it’s the trail up to Mount Shasta; I’ve still never made it up to the trails around Mammoth Lakes).
There’s a certain itchy discipline about staying on trail in the Bay Area: all temptations to bushwhack are tempered by the tangles of poison oak standing between us and more enticing terrain. And there’s always the charming prospect of fleeing somebody’s marijuana plantation in a hail of gunfire. Plus, it’s kinder to the roughed-up near-urban environment to just stay on the path and give the rest of woods a chance to be, well, woods.
But I can see how things would be different in vast open country like the High Sierra. Ecosystems that recover from punishing storms every winter can no doubt recover from the depredations of the occasional hiker.
I like trails because they get me back where I came from — I’m not even sure I’d be able to enjoy myself off-trail because I’d be devoting too much attention to avoiding getting lost. I’d like to hear from the more adventurous among you: how do you stay found? What are the major pitfalls to avoid? What are the benefits compared to the risks?
Chime in via the comments form.
I’ve only been off-trail once or twice, I tend to agree with you on staying on the trail. Not only does it keep me not-lost, but it will also allow me to protect the park and the natural surroundings.
One main trail I left was on the east side of Annadel, in Sonoma. I saw an opportunity to see a portion of the park that was supposedly going to be “renovated” by the removal of a specific grove of trees because they were not native to the area (I forget the exact tree, but I think it was eucalyptus?). I ended up wandering for close to an hour before finding the trail again… not fun. These days I’ve got an older Garmin GPS which would have been welcome back then. 🙂
Now, Geocaching is another story! Going off-trail is part of the plan in some cases, and while I’ve not gotten lost, avoiding spiderwebs, mosquitos, and poison oak can be tough! 🙂
Z.
I’ve really only done off-trail hiking above treeline; every time I try doing it at lower altitude I either get ripped to shreds or, as you say, am too concerned about not getting lost to really enjoy it. (And in so many places with easy access and careless hikers, it’s NOT an example you want to set.)
Trails are great for getting somewhere in a (relative) hurry, but going off-trail really gives you the feeling of wildness and wilderness and you see so much more, because you *have* to: where should I go next? What’s the best route from here to there? How do I do that without harming myself or the land? Being off-trail makes you think and connect and grapple with the landscape, whereas the trail builders have mostly taken care of that for you; you “just” have to walk.
Years ago, I did part of Roper’s Sierra High Route and it was unbelievably gorgeous and challenging and almost like a dream; there were days I cried because it was so tiring and exhausting, mentally and physically; I eventually dropped down to the Muir Trail because I realized that solo offtrail travel was not for me. But there were moments of beauty and joy and I still think of how amazing the high country is and I want to go back– but this time, with a partner.
Lately I’ve been adding in off-trail sections to all of my weekend backpacking trips. I live in Bozeman, Montana and we have access to vast tracts of wilderness and little to no damage is caused by the occassional off-trail hike. Typically my off-trail routes are either to summit a peak or to connect to drainages that don’t have a connector trail.
Next week I set off on a four-day hike all of which will be off-trail using only map and compass for navigation (as well as other prohibitions such as no water bottle, no lighters or matches, etc… but that’s another discussion).
There will be a group of seven of us. It should be an interesting trek most of which will be in the 10,000 foot range. I’m excited to put some off-trail miles in true wilderness trekking style.
I’ve done quite a bit of cross-country hiking in my life. The main requirement is relatively open terrain.
Early on I walked the foothills near Anderson south of Redding; these are open and grassy with blue oaks, live oaks, and gray pines, similar to the hills in the Bay Area.
Later it was near and above timberline in the Trinity Alps, California Cascades, and Sierra Nevada. Again, mostly open country, although much more rugged with steep slopes.
I still do some cross-country in my home mountains around Mount Shasta. I also typically do it alone. (Well, my dog Molly is usually with me, but she’s not really the Lassie type.)
I’m very careful not to do anything too dangerous, and I always tell someone where I’m going and when I’ll return. I always bring a cell phone, extra food and water, a space blanket, waterproof matches, and extra clothes in case I have to spend an unplanned night outdoors.
It’s also very important to be sure of one’s orientation. I’ve also walked off-trail in the Four Corners region of the Southwest. One dusk near Escalante in southern Utah I lost the trail and wound up wandering by starlight (and Venus-light) well past dark before I lucked unto the dirt road to my van.
Mangan, you’ve firmly established that you’re a pussy.
Anyway, I do a *lot* of bushwhacking. It’s great. Some of the
most interesting stuff & locations I’ve found are far from any
trail. Following a drainage or ridgeline are two easy ways to
avoid getting lost. Of course you don’t wade into a thicket of
poison oak. That’s part of the challange — finding your way
around such impediments.
I happen to have an excellent sense of direction and I know how
to read a map. Plus the parks in the Bay Area are just too small,
and usually well-bounded, to get seriously lost. Now one time
X-C skiing in Yosemite…
The notion that somehow bushwhacking would hurt the environment,
especially in the Bay Area, is laughable. Most of the land around
here had been logged, grazed, etc. for decades before being turned
into parks. Lots of it is still “multi-use” — livestock grazing
being one big example. Much of the region looks nothing like it
did before settlers brought their European ways, and will probably
never revert to such a state. Plus by definition when bushwhacking
you’re going where few if any ever go, so your effect will be
vanishingly small. Only if large numbers of people followed your
route would there be a problem, but that would mean a trail was being
created and hence it would no longer be bushwhacking. Most hikers
cause more damage to the environment by driving their car to the
trailhead than by anything they do while there.
The biggest hazard is poison oak. Distant second and third places
are falling off/down a steep slope, and rattlesnakes. Most hiking
in the Bay Area is so easy that little more than sneakers is needed.
But when I know I’m going to do some serious bushwhacking, I wear
my full-on hiking boots, and maybe gaiters. In their way, they
greatly reduce those threats. Oh, and if there’s a chance I’m going
to be out late, and with me there almost always is, then I bring
a headlamp.
So if you’re a pussy, don’t bushwhack. If you’re a whiny follower,
don’t bushwhack. It’s not for everybody. But if you think for
yourself, take personal responsibility, and try to live life to
the fullest, then give it a try.
I like to go off trail once in a while.
The key to not getting lost for me is basically a good topo map and compass (consulted often), taking a good look at the terrain (if possible) from a good vantage point before going in, and staying on ridges where possible. I also always have my digital camera, so I can take photos of landmarks in places that are easy to get lost in case I have to backtrack (never needed to so yet) – I can just follow my photos back.
While against the principles of “leave no trace”, I also leave traces with tree branches or piles of brush where I think I could get lost. I also bring my machette – the area I live and hike in are far from pristine and have no rules about whacking your way through except in national parks, but there you are not even supposed to leave the trail.
I also bing a light (but strong) climbing rope in the case that I come across micro-terrain to steep to scramble down safely. I don’t go anywhere requiring a harness though.
Winter is easiest because there are no trails anyway, and the snow covers all the underbrush. Summer is the hardest because of the dense brush and difficulty to see the terrain around you through the leaves. Late fall / early winter is nice because you can see through the trees to check out the terrain and locate yourself on the map.
The biggest thing to keep in mind though when planning is that the going is WAY slower than walking on a trail. Make sure you are ready to spend the night.
So long as you’re in a low-travel area, or restricted travel area, and you use the appropriate techniques, off trail hiking can be done with little or no impact on the environment. Having done it in some stretches of the Colorado Rockies and throughout northern New Mexico, I can say that it is pretty OK. If, however, you start getting more than 1 or 2,000 people in an area over a month social trails will start to form.
BTW, best off trail hiking *must* be in Denali. I loved my trip there. Of course, it’s also highly restricted…
> Plus the parks in the Bay Area are just too small,
and usually well-bounded, to get seriously lost
Didn’t someone manage to get lost for a week in Castle Rock a few years back?
Yeah, because they got off trail and thought they could find their way in a thickly wooded ravine.
I LOVE off-trail hiking in the Sierra! (Truth be told, if you look closely it will be apparent that others have been there first, so perhaps “off-trail” exaggerates a bit.) My favorite kind of place in the world is the open country just at and above timberline. Pick a destination and go.
There is an intellectual challenge to off-trail hiking that is very appealing, and I generally find myself much more tuned in to my surroundings when I have to find my way and make route decisions constantly. This kind of travel is quite a different beast than on-trail hiking. (Which I do also enjoy.)
By the way, it is possible to do some off-trail hiking at certain places in the Bay Area. You must be more responsible about picking where you do this, since the potential for environmental damage is greater given the possibility that many more people may share your interest and given the generally more fragile soils and plants. Winter is a great time to try this since much of the foliage dies back and routes are more apparent. In addition, there are far fewer other people out and about at this time. I won’t get too specific, but grasslands and open oak forests are fine places to try this.
Dan
We went off-trail over the granite to get to Iceland Lake in the Emigrant Wilderness. Since it was granite, I didn’t feel like I was having an adverse effect on the environment by stomping on vegetation.