Trailspotting reviews the Kata T-214, a way-cool sling bag for carrying your cameras into the woods. It’s built by a company that makes bags for the Israeli military and looks tough enough to intimidate a terrorist (and might well convert to Uzi-carrying duty; good luck getting through security at SFO). Another fan reviews it in even greater depth.
LowePro makes a few sling bags, too. None of these are precisely cheap at $80 to 40, but if you’re hauling $2,000 worth of lenses and camera bodies, it doesn’t make much sense to skimp on a case. Mind you these are SLR-and-lenses bags — definite overkill for the point-and-shoot-crowd though LowePro has some interesting choices for compacts). I have an old bag from Eagle Creek that has plenty of room for my Canon A710 plus a snack lunch.
More hard-core shutterbugs might like the integrated setup from Kinesis Gear (to lust after if nothing else). This is the kind of gear National Geographic shooters take on African safari. In a pinch they can stuff the bag into the jaws of an attacking lioness.
The system that appeals most to my inner geek is the Rotation 360 pack, which rotates part of the camera bag from back to front in a snap. Watch the video to see how it works. Very clever. A steal at just $279.
Makes me think I might have to get a big camera to justify having one of these awesome packs.
I am still trying to find the camera backpack system I really want. I don’t know how far into the back country I will want to hike with my cameras and tripod and lenses but besides carrying the gear for photography, I want to and need to carry gear for the hiking too. Like water, and lunch, and a first aid kit (you never know) and other incidentals. And if I am hiking far enough, and if the weather is warm enough, and if there is no convenient source of water, I am going to need to carry it. I would love to see a camera backpack that can carry two camera bodies, and at least 3 lenses, plus filters, batteries, etc, and my lunch and a 3 liter Camelbak in it, and or at least two liter size bottles on the side. I know Lowepro makes a hydration backpack with 50 oz pouch inside and that is nice but it ain’t gonna cut it for me. I want more water! If anyone has ideas, or knows of products they like, please share the knowledge!!! Thanks!
Hi Tom:
Not surprisingly, I’ve thought about this issue a lot. (My photo site is at http://www.gdanmitchell.com/ and there are some posts/articles on this topic there, too.)
But first, I had to laugh at myself a bit as I thought about your reference to people who haul “$2000” worth of gear on the trail. I carry gear that is worth, uh, “more” than that… 🙂
If I’m going very light – as in my DSLR body and one lens and maybe one additional small lens – I often carry a large lumbar pack from Mountainsmith. (Hint: when carrying a heavily loaded lumbar pack, also put the carrying strap across your chest/shoulders to take part of the load and to more easily swing the whole thing around in front of you for better access.)
To carry a bit more photo gear on relatively short day hikes, I use the Lowepro Slingshot 200AW. There is a series of these bags going from smaller (100) to largest (300), each of which is sort of a backpack with only one shoulder strap. This also lets you easily swing the pack around without removing it so that you can get at the gear inside. This is a very popular bag with photographers, and the 200 model seems to provide the best compromise of space, size, and ease of carry for many. It can carry a DSLR and a few lenses, plus some other odds and ends. I have attached a water bottle carrier to the outside of mine.
Beyond this we get to real backpacks designed for photographers. They fall into two rough categories – those that are basically camera bags that can be carried on the back for short distances, and backpacks that have been modified for photographic needs. Lots of photographers use the former, but most of them aren’t real hikers. I have one such bag – a wonderful model from Thinktank Photo. While it is great in terms of fitting in a lot of gear and providing access to the gear, it is only OK in terms of backpack comfort. I’ll sometimes use it on the trail for short distances, but that’s it. My main hiking photography bag is the Lowepro Rover AW. This is the size of a rather large daypack, verging on small backpacking pack size. The lower heavily padded section is optimized for carrying lenses and so forth, while the separate upper section is about the size of a small daypack and is useful for carrying all-day trail stuff. A downside compared to “normal” backpacks is that it is heavier; a downside compared to “camera pack” like my Thinktank model is that access to gear is not as easy.
For real multi-day backpacking most agree that you need to simply figure out the best way to cart and access your camera gear. My solution is to carry a Lowepro Topload Zoom bag mounted to a chest harness, with some additional gear riding in or (e.g. tripod) on the pack.
Dan
Thanks Dan! It doesn’t sound like there is a perfect solution out there. At some point I will probaby buy one of those sling bags. At the moment I have a Lowepro Off Trail 1 bag that I wear in front. I put it on first and then I put my Camelbak pack on over that. I’ve hiked up the Lyman Willson Trail at Henry Coe to Willson Peak with that and back down again. It is a little annoying hiking up hill with it though as my knees keep knocking into the bottom of the front pack, slowing me down. Maybe what I want is a sling pack. I wil definitely give that a look. Thanks!
I use Kata bags and love them. VERY comfortable to carry.
– jim
Is there a bag that anyone recommends to carry 4 days worth of gear for a hike (clothes, sleeping bag etc) and has an easily accesible compartment for the camera?