Ask Steve why he never takes a camera hiking and he’ll mention the boxes & boxes of slides from backpacking trips of days gone by that he never looks at anymore.
Then there’s Dan, who could equip a polar expedition on what he’s shelled out for high-end camera bodies, lenses, tripods & such.
I’m in the middle — I don’t want to carry the weight, spend the money or endure the aggravation of a bigger, better camera. My digital point-and-shoot brings home OK pictures most weekends; the quality depends mostly on the scenery.
A few conclusions based on a few years of hiking, taking pictures and posting them online:
- Image stabilization technology is the best thing to happen to cameras since the flashbulb. If you’re looking for a light point-and-shoot for hiking & backpacking, pay extra to get it (I’m thinking it’ll be pretty much standard on all digital cameras in a couple years.)
- Cameras that use double-A batteries are far more flexible — you can buy a recharger and a bunch of cheap rechargeable batteries and always have some power ready. GPS units often also use double-A batteries, so you get multiple uses.
- Pictures you plan to air publicly should be cropped for best effect.
- If you’re planning to post a bunch of pictures, leave out redundant images, even if they’re from different locales.
- Master all your current camera’s functions before you buy another one with even more functions.
- Backlighting is evil. You can get some cool silhouette effects, but otherwise, make sure the sun’s over your shoulder.
Well, these are the first that spring to mind … feel free to add suggestions.
Great observations, I totally agree.
I’ve been using a point and shoot for years with great results, then a couple of months ago I upgraded to a cheapish DSLR (Canon Digital Rebel). I’ve been forcing myself to take the DSLR on my day-hikes to justify my outlay, but it’s doubling both the weight & bulk I’m carrying with me.
Compounding this is the fact that I’m not taking better pictures when I’m hiking anyway, because (a) I don’t want the photography to slow my hiking down, (b) I often don’t have the right lens on the body and it’s too much hassle to change and (c) I often have to keep my camera packed away because I don’t want to trip and fall on it.
I’m sorely tempted to going back to a point-and-shoot (Lumix FX-01) for my day-hikes, which seem plenty good enough for my Trailspotting website anyway.
Stuart: deep down you probably want to take better pictures — maybe the trick is to decide “this is a photography outing that happens to require a hike” and take the big camera; or decide “this is a hike where it’ll be nice to have a camera along just in case” and take the point-n-shoot.
Thing about photography is, you need patience and the willingness to wait hours for the right light or the right scene.
flickr.com
Free photo sharing site. It’s still the beset.
I’ve always been a point-n-shoot’er when on hikes. I have two SLRs, both very old and out dated by today’s standards, but they are regular film cameras. The little Cannon Powershot camera I use fits right into the palm of one hand, and weighs about not’a. I have an aftermarket belt case for it that has zippered closures, and a compartment for extra memory cards, and an extra battery. I can put it on my pant belt, or pack belt, and the camera is always at hand fairly quickly, even on the move. And easily back in and out of the way where it’s safe. I would feel naked without it.
It only has x3 optical zoom, so it’s lousy for getting useful wildlife photos, or for trying to get photos from long range. The built-in light metering is not that smart, so I have learned not to trust it. I have some tricks for getting the light right. Also I find that when doing macro photos, I have to use my hand to trick the auto-focus, or I might not have the right range.
Thanks for the helpful hints. I’m in the middle, too. I rely on an ancient Canon Powershot S40 for taking photos on the trails. It’s basically a brick with a flash, but it has done a decent job so far. It would be nice to upgrade to a bigger and better camera, but unless I become serious about photography, it doesn’t seem like a wise investment. One accessory I have been tempted to get, though, is a tripod. Something small and light (like the Gorillapod) could be a helpful piece of equipment even for a hiker who prefers a point-and-shoot camera.
By the way my camera is the Canon A710IS (IS is for image stabilization)…
This cam is a little bigger and bulkier than some of the other Canon pix but it has more capabilities and a 4x zoom.
David said: “One accessory I have been tempted to get, though, is a tripod. Something small and light (like the Gorillapod)”
I have one of the medium size Gorillapads, and it’s great as long as there is something to attach it to, or place it on. I also have a hiking staff which has a round grip at the top which screws off converting into a monopod. The monopod is tricky to use, but I have often used it by pushing the pointed end into the soil so it stands up by itself. This gives me a higher shooting postion.
For me, it’s so totally unscientific and unprofessional! I just shoot from the hip and hope they turn out. In many ways, even if the lighting is poor, it’s more about angles and composition. . .I’ve always loved taking photographs, but never had any formal training or desire to develop my “talents” (meagre as they are) as an “art form.” What I do is more accidental art , probably. Consequently, it takes a hundred shots of a pretty scene – or one lucky one – to feel good about posting for your viewing enjoyment. But, alas, I confess, I’m probably guilty of violating most of Tom’s tenets.
Great post Tom! And I know for a fact I am guilty of violating all sorts of Tom’s Tenets. Guilty as charged. Either that or old habits die hard. But when I an hiking for hiking’ sake, I take a lot of quick pictures on the way to document the adventure and hope more than a few come out OK. I’ve only in the last few years decided to get into photography and I have much to learn before I can say I am good at it. But when I am out trying to do photography, I have learned that I need to work the scene and take a lot of pictures and come back again and again on different days at different times in different weather and different seasons and work it. And on one of those days I just might get a good picture. But then I am guilty of posting all the mediocre ones I must confess but I have an excuse. I like to look at them over my lunch hour and ponder how I can take them better. Otherwise, guilty, guilty, guilty! 🙂
After decades of hauling a Canon AE-1 then the ELAN, I accumulated about 50 carousels of 35mm slides. It took a while but now digital has as good resolution as the big slide show. When Kodak stopped making slide projectors it was all over. So I went with the Casio Exilim series. My first was a 1 MP credit card guy. So small I lost it in Oregon somewhere. Then I gotrhe 3 MP one. Still small and most of the pix for my book I got with that one. Then I splurged and got a 10 MP one. Sweeeet. But in September I took it spelunking and the LCD screen got hosed on the final 20-minute chimney climb. I just ordered the new 8MP one – really really small. But they now have UTube capture, Ebay Best shot, Anti-shake and MPEG4 .mov video. I am a happy camper. NO more hauling the albatross around my neck. Oh, I also got a Slide-to-digital scanner at Costco on-line for $149. There goes my rainy days.
-Rick D
http://www.HikeHalfDome.com
I’m a point – and – shooter when I take a camera at all. It’s tough to peel off my gloves, so I usually don’t drag the camera along as often as I should.
I really interested in checking out the units featured in November’s (I think) Backpacker. One of them may be the ticket for encouraging me to stop, point and shoot a lot more than I do now.
Besides, I’ve graduated to sound.