Those outside of California might be only dimly aware that there’s a “second Yosemite Valley” that happens to have 300 feet of water in it. It’s called Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, and it was created in the early 20th century, much to the dismay of John Muir, to provide a stable water supply for San Francisco, which burnt to the ground in the great quake of 1906. I saw Hetch Hetchy for the first time last month and was stunned more than I expected to see that anybody had even considered placing a dam in such a place, much less actually done it. Here’s what the Hetch Hetchy valley looks like today:
The latest rage in environmentalist circles is to correct the ecological crime of the century by draining the reservoir and letting nature take its course (what to do about the dam is a whole other matter; it wasn’t built with the idea of ever being removed). In an odd moment of thoughtfulness, the Bush administration budgeted several million dollars to study whether it’s feasible.
My takeaway after visiting the reservoir is that even if we can make the valley “whole” again, we’re better off letting it stand as a monument to the cost of so-called modern civilization. Some people want to imagine a world in which we get to have all our favorite toys and our favorite wilderness sites. Well, we can restore this Hetch Hetchy, but it’ll just require the creation of another one somewhere else. Fixing one ecosystem by ruining another is a strange kind of environmentalism.
I read about Hetch Hetchy in Galen Rowells “High and Wild.” it’s sort of a replica of the “other Yosemite Valley”.
Quite amazing and I believe G.W Bush is a budding Teddy Roosevelt based on the latest things to come to light about restoring our nations wildlands. But then he did also say he would not engage in nation building during the 2000 presidential debates.
To me it seems impractical to restore it only to search for some less worthy place for a dam.
Hetch Hetchy is California’s version of abortion/guns – arguments over it could go on forever to nobody’s satisfaction, because there are too many compelling arguments on both sides of the issue.
In the context of the mountain range being several million years old, it seems kinda vain for humans to imagine what’s happened there in the past hundred years matters much in the grand scheme of things.
My thing is, don’t take something pretty and make it ugly on a whim or to chase a buck. As the picture shows, Hetch Hetchy is gorgeous even with all that water in it. Draining it will leave a water stain that’ll take god knows how long to wash off. Several hundred years, probably. For a very long time it’ll be far uglier than it is now if all the water’s taken out.
I’ve always been in the “leave it there” camp on this one. Having what is, in effect, yet another High Sierra lake isn’t doing drastic things to the local ecosystem (vs. some of the central valley reserviors that are introducing a highly non-natural element to the local environment)
IMHO, the presense of the reservior has greatly diminished the human impact to the area surrounding the Hetcy Hetchy Valley. Id rather see the water than the inevitable road, hotel, and gift shops that would be there otherwise.