The worrywarts tell us: never hike alone, but pretty much all of us do it probably most of the time, because it’s so much easier to just find your way to a trailhead and start walking than it is to attempt to find other people who want to go to the same place at the same time for the same distance at the same pace. Solo is like hiking itself: simple.
But there are times when you’re going to need to be with other people, like for instance, hiking at altitude on strange trails where getting lost or falling down a ravine could get you into deep doo-doo. That was my experience over the weekend, when I went out with some experienced backpackers to get a taste of Sierra air.
The camping was excellent — my companions were smart, funny and fun to be around — but the hiking was what I’ll call California-style, which is to say: the fast leave the slow in the dust. (In my case the fast were kind, and gave me many chances to catch up, but not all California-style hikers are so thoughtful). It’s a perfectly reasonable arrangement, because nobody is obliged to walk at somebody else’s pace, which is a drag. It’s just taking me longer than I expected to get used to it.
Ever since I learned to walk, I’ve been slow. In school I was always the last-place finisher, the last one picked, the one who lost every one-on-one athletic competition he ever entered. The great thing about graduating was: no more gym class humiliations.
So, after driving to the mountains with one’s fun, cheerful companions and seeing them promptly disappear up the trail, I was back in school again — the kid who couldn’t keep up. It’s a bit annoying to have this happen at the tender age of 44.
One thing I’ve noticed in my group-hiking travels is there are always the people who are happy with their pace, who realize it’s not a race, that there’s no hurry to get the hike over with. Someday I’m going to finally graduate from school and become one of them.
Getting older helped me get over this.
I used to “rack up the miles” on pack trips, plugging along at a fairly brisk pace and waiting for the others at breaks and lunch. Until his late teens I could beat my oldest son up most Sierra passes – carrying a heavier pack.
But now I’m over thirty. Actually, I’m over 40. Well, to be honest, I’m over 50.
These days, while I still enjoy hiking quickly and efficiently when possible, I’m also much more content to go slow and take in my surroundings. Photography has also helped to slow me down.
On long, tough days I simply start an hour or more early and go at my own pace – we always get together again by the end of the day.
In a sense, this gives me the best of both worlds. I get solitude, which I really do enjoy. And I get company, which I also enjoy.
Dan
I’ve been on both sides of pacing differences and its equally frustrating to be the leader as the lagger in these situations. “California Style” does seem to be the popular (and maybe the best) solution to the issue.
If you really want to keep a group together on the trail and reduce frustrations, I’ve found its best to allow the slowest party member lead. Its much easier for the faster hikers to stick to a slower pace if they’re following rather than having to check behind them and/or stop repeatedly to wait for the laggards.
I heartily disagree with the thought that the faster hikers are somehow having a lesser experience than the slower folks- especially if everyone is moving at their natural comfortable pace.
Once my legs got used to the idea of hiking regularly I settled into a pace that hasn’t changed much in 18 months. My fast-hiking companions of last weekend assured me I’d get stronger and faster over time but I can’t help thinking if I were going to get faster, it would’ve happened by now.
For hikers, pace is a signature.
I do think we all should get outside our comfort zone — it’s one of the only ways to really discover new things. In a group the fast can always walk slower but the slow cannot walk faster without risking serious exhaustion-related injuries that can be fatal.
The strong hikers who have to stop constantly to wait for the laggards are actually doing themselves far more harm than if they just slowed down to the pace of the slowest hiker.
Main thing is to have a plan to account for varying speed levels, and for everybody to accept the pluses and minuses of the individuals.
You see things going slow that you wouldn’t see going fast, but the opposite is also true.