Out ‘n’ About is fundamentally a blog out taking one’s recreational vehicle into the backcountry. Of course as a loyal GoBlog reader I’m shocked and appalled by the extravagant petroleum thirst required to get any kind of camper into the woods, but lots of nice people I know (parents and landlord among them) are RV people so I tend to take the middle ground where campers are concerned. (Not that sleeping under anything with a hard-shell cover and wheels is actaully “camping” in my book. To admit such heresy would have the Sierra Club’s secret outlook-enforcement team hounding my every footstep).
Out ‘n’ About merits a link because its owner has tons of hiking and backpacking-related links, which shows evidence of backcountry devotion that puts me in cut-the-guy-some-slack mode.
While it’s true that RVs are fume-spewing gas hogs, it’s also true that people aren’t driving them to work every day. Most folks take theirs out for a few weeks a year at most, which makes me wonder if we shouldn’t actually be selling our cars, buying RVs for vacations, and pedaling our bikes for the morning commute. Which do you think would save the most gas?
I now live in an RV – a 34-foot fifth wheel. I don’t yet own a truck to pull it, so gas guzzling is not an issue yet, but I’m thinking I might eventually pull it into the boonies for a while once a year.
I have to disagree with you on this site, Tom. I looked at it quite a few weeks ago and concluded it was your basic SPLOG site, designed to steal material from other bloggers who conscientiously post helpful information or at least informed opinion.
There is no contact information to the blogger anywhere on the site, nor any profile information. The most prominent real-estate of the main page is devoted to pay-per-click advertising, not to any useful description of the intent of the site, or the the useful content of the site itself. Even most of his blog posts are pay-per-click ads or pay-per-referral online-store affiliate links.
The fact that he links to your blog and my podcast is probably because he sees our rank in search engines like Google and Technorati and knows that mentioning our sites will bring traffic to his site, where people will click on his ads.
He’s not adding to the pool of knowledge or offering a useful public service — it’s just a scam. Don’t support this guy. He’s just trying to siphon off your hard work to make a vacuous marketing vehicle. Please edit your post to remove the link to his site, because otherwise you’ve given him something he hasn’t earned: Legitimacy.
Steve: here’s the guy’s technorati profile: http://www.technorati.com/profile/michaelpgoad
Here’s his primary blog:
http://www.pddoc.com/farnham/
Here’s a link w/some bio info for the guy:
http://www.pddoc.com/farnham/?p=103
Also: He doesn’t link to Two-Heel Drive.
The problem w/that guy’s site is that he’s gone overboard trying to monetize his content. For his trouble of putting google ads everywhere he can squeeze one in, he’s probably earning about 12 cents and hour.
If you do some poking around, you’ll find pages with counters at the bottom revealing hit counts in double and triple figures. Whatever the guy’s up to, he’s *not* making any money at it.
Tom,
I think we’re coming to a stage – in terms of the earth’s environmental crisis – where we have to be clearer, and more assertive about all of this.
In the vast majority of cases there is no need for this kind of thing – even if you are only using them during the weekend!
I, for one, now choose not to own a car at all – but then I live in cities where public transport is excellent.
Andy: I agree with your sentiment entirely but I do believe the problem of a million car drivers commuting to work solo ever day is far more pressing than the few thousands who drive gas-guzzling RVs. Also, the cost of RVs discourages most people from ever having one.
Part of the problem is the imperative of protecting wild spaces requires an annoying compromise: people won’t care about places they can’t go. So somebody with a camper at least likes to get into the outdoors and might be more amenable to a “let’s protect the earth” message.
We all have to kick the petroleum jones, for sure, not just because it’s gonna run out anyway but because burning it is ruining the planet and buying it is making certain zealots dangerously wealthy.
a lot of spots i hit here in the south include a designated area for RV hookups and what-have-you to attract your average ‘truck camper’ for an overnight experience and feeling of being in the woods. being a hiker that rolls up in a small foreign job with nice gas mileage and a pack in the trunk housing just the essentials, i give them great leniency. my take is at least they are getting out into the wild for a day rather than sitting at home watching re-runs of the springer show after driving back and forth to work in their soccer mom mini-vans. they enjoy some of the things what we do, right? hell, most are elders that i wouldn’t want on the trails anywho…ok that was a bad joke.
You dug a little deeper than I did for some of that information. The profile you cite tells me almost nothing about the author. There is an e-mail adress for him on one of his other blogs.
I’ll cut Michael Goad some slack and appologize for these comments I made above:
“The fact that he links to your blog and my podcast is probably because he sees our rank in search engines like Google and Technorati and knows that mentioning our sites will bring traffic to his site, where people will click on his ads.
“He’s not adding to the pool of knowledge or offering a useful public service — it’s just a scam. Don’t support this guy. He’s just trying to siphon off your hard work to make a vacuous marketing vehicle. Please edit your post to remove the link to his site, because otherwise you’ve given him something he hasn’t earned: Legitimacy.”
However, I stand by these comments:
“The most prominent real-estate of the main page is devoted to pay-per-click advertising, not to any useful description of the intent of the site, or the the useful content of the site itself. Even most of his blog posts are pay-per-click ads or pay-per-referral online-store affiliate links.”
I also observe that, in January 2006 postings alone, about 20% are content he seems to have created. The remainder is either advertising or quotes from other sites.
Perhaps I was too quick to presume the site creator’s intent. But for his own credibility, I suggest he back off on the commercialism a little bit.
Tom,
You’re right at one level, of course.
But the problem here is a cultural one. we really do need to stop messing about with such things when we just don’t need them. After all, these things are probably used more often to drop in to a store than to go out into really wild territory!
I don’t consider RVing nor car camping as camping. Maybe I am too mean.
I think it’s hard to live in the States without a car, because the public transportation is simply not good enough and that is probably because the population is not dense, given that I am from Taipei.
We can only do our best, such as driving hybrids, carpooling or driving as little as possible, and I just don’t see RV fits into this category.