The other day I was stumbling up out of the rocky creekbed at Sunol’s Little Yosemite with Lou Reed’s “Heroin” in my headphones.
Heroin, be the death of me
Heroin, its my wife and its my life
Because a mainer to my vein
Leads to a center in my head
And then I’m better off than dead
And I found myself thinking if Lou had done a bit more hiking, he’d have been a bit less needful of needle-induced stimulation. Then I was thinking about the adventure junkies who get a similar rush from activities in which death is a plausible outcome. I’ve never been a druggie (too damn cheap and jail-averse) but for some reason this is one of my favorite songs.
I used to think you had to have every sense tuned to the natural world so you wouldn’t miss the bee’s buzz or the hawk’s scream, but lately I’ve been thinking that if I’m going to be out walking for four or five hours, I might as well multitask. The only free time I have to listen to tunes is when I’m working out or hiking.
There are hassles: the headphone cord wants to get tangled. You have to take them off to talk to people. You get those “why does he need his headphones out here in nature?” looks. I used to give those looks.
In an ideal world you’d never listen to music while trying to do something else — it would detract from both activities. In my magical utopia I’d be able to go to rock concerts every night and not wake up with ringing ears, aching brain and empty wallet. I’d hike every morning at dawn with the bird chorus to keep me company. I’d never have to work at a job that made somebody else richer while while I eked along on whatever that somebody imagined my labors were worth.
Of course the lessons of history are that utopian quests end in grief, and that humans either adapt to their circumstances or drive themselves nuts railing against them. I get about 80 percent of what I like about listening to music if I do it while hiking; I lose about 20 percent of the hiking experience that comes from hearing every twig snap. Eighty percent of something’s better than 100 percent of nothing.
I’m one of those guys who can barely contain the urge to scream along when Brian Johnson growls “Stand up and be counted, for what you are about to receive…” (it’s curious that I enjoy AC/DC more now than I did in their heyday, but that’s a subject for somebody else’s blog). With my iPhone set on shuffle, the next tune might be Chet Baker or Beethoven, a contrast akin to walking out of the trees onto a grassy hillside, or stepping out of the wind blast on a hilltop.
They do kinda go together.
Nice post. I am also guilty of hiking with headphones. I don’t listen all the time, but I find that my teeny tiny little ipod shuffle, with hours and hours of battery life and every song ever produced by the Foo Fighters, sometimes gives me that extra push I need to haul myself over a particularly tough Sierra pass.
I generally only use an ipod when I’m backpacking, hiking ~8-10 hours a day, and even then I’ll only have it on for an hour or two when I’m separated from my hiking companions and on a particularly mundane or tough stretch.
In a pinch, headphones also help drown out the snores of your hiking companions in the tents next to you, so that can’t be bad.
By the way, my shuffle has engraving on it. It says ‘HYOH’ on the back.
I have hiked with headphones once, listening to Patrick O’hearn (At first light) while hiking in Prairie Creek Redwoods 20 years ago. Cool experience, almost like drugs, but it also isolated me from my surroundings.
One of the main attractions of hiking is experiencing the world with all senses. As you point out, turning off one of those senses, limits the experience. When I hike, I want to hear the world around me. I want to hear birds, wind, the crunch of the trail under my feet, as well as bicycles, snakes and other hazards.
And there is almost always a tune playing in my head anyway.
So no thank you on the ear buds.
I’ll do it if I’m purely on a workout hike (i.e. Mission Peak or one of my other local standards)
I hike with headphones frequently & enjoy it.
Ack! Camera, cellphone, GPS, music player — with all these technological
gee-gaws, how do you ever pay any attention to where you’re hiking? You
could just watch a movie of the outdoors while slogging on a treadmill.
Are you so uncomfortable in your own head that you have to have a soundtrack
to distract you?
I’m not an absolutist, but 95% of the time I think you’d be better off
without the headphones.
Give me the soundtrack of Mother Nature any day over canned music! The only part about Mouse’s rant I disagree with is the 95%! (On the other hand, I am not one to be critical or judgmental of those who prefer to substitute Father Technology’s sounds; only curious as to how I-tunes trumps the music of the wind, the bird song, melodious water, the rustle of leaves, and that twig snapping underfoot.)
I hiked without the headphones today, though I should’ve just to annoy Mr. Mouse, who seems comfortable psychoanalyzing people he’s never met and thus has no earthly idea how the brain belonging to the subject of his rant ticks. Ignorance has never prevented a ranter from ranting, though, and I suspect it actually encourages it.
Dare I mention to Mr. Mouse I am also an avid user of treking poles!
Don: It’s entirely possible that even Herr. Mouse uses poles, but rest assured his are better than yours and his technique superior.
It’s surprising he doesn’t use his real name to claim full credit for his better-than-the-rest-of-us-ness.
Four sentences hardly constitutes a rant. And posing a single
question simply doesn’t equate to psychoanalysis. Such sloppy
use of language portends poorly for someone with journalistic
pretentions.
More curious is the notion that after making hundreds of
entries on your blog, nothing has been revealed about how
your brain “ticks.” In fact, it is all too obvious how
it ticks.
As but one example, consider your responses here when a
contrary opinion is posted. You can’t even consider an
argument on its merits for a moment without descending into
ad hominem. In the face of such poor behavior, my continued
anonymity is quite justified.
Well, Bob, you identified yourself quite well with that last post. Your secret is safe with me.
It struck me as odd that anybody would go to the trouble of needling the keeper of an honest hiking blog. Just now I realized there is only one person on the planet capable of that.
And if you’re not who I think you are, it doesn’t matter. You’re the same person in every respect, even if you’re not in the same skin. And you’re a hiker, which suggests redeeming characteristics.
I know you can’t help being a world-class twit. Just stay on topic and I won’t ban you like every other site you’ve posted on.