{"id":779,"date":"2004-05-02T08:58:05","date_gmt":"2004-05-02T08:58:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/?p=779"},"modified":"2004-05-02T08:58:05","modified_gmt":"2004-05-02T08:58:05","slug":"google-ipo-skepticism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/2004\/05\/google-ipo-skepticism\/","title":{"rendered":"Google IPO skepticism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.venturpreneur.com\/weblogs\/archives\/000359.html\">Whole bunch of it at this blog. <\/a><br \/>\n<P>Naturally, I&#8217;m skeptical about the the company and its founders, who stand to make oodles of extra free money if the IPO price is suitably high. Yet I&#8217;m also skeptical of the skeptics: If I were hoping to buy a block of Google shares in the IPO, I might trash their prospects to cool demand for the stock so I get mine at Costco prices.<br \/>\n<P>This is one of the reasons wise people are saying &#8220;give the market a while to make sense of the Google IPO.&#8221;<br \/>\n<P> For context, consider the case of United Parcel Service, whose shares were traded publicly for the first time on Nov. 11, 1999. The stock opened at $65, rose to $75 in the next two days and plunged, falling to as a low as $50 in the next few months. It didn&#8217;t resume trading regularly above $65 until last fall.<br \/>\n<P>So here&#8217;s one of the most recognizable brands on earth, &#8220;the tightest ship in the shipping business,&#8221;  with a proven track record whose stock goes on the market at high price by IPO standards.  A bet on UPS&#8217;s service is a no-brainer: pay the next-day fee and you get your goods tomorrow. But a bet on UPS&#8217;s stock &#8212; if you bought at the overhyped IPO prices &#8212; could&#8217;ve taken four years to pay off.  Savvy investors who knew UPS was a good company whose stock would inevitably go out of fashion waited their turn, bought UPS at $50 and are happy as clams with it trading at $70.<br \/>\n<P>A lot of folks are apt to make the incorrect comparison to Ebay, whose stock has defied gravity and made tons of money for its early investors. Ebay has always been a hot stock: the company&#8217;s sales and earnings growth have been so powerful in the past couple years that people who hated all tech stocks were still buying Ebay &#8212; its business performance and its stock performances  made it a rock-solid bullish bet. It&#8217;s easy to forget that Ebay was popular but untested when it went public in the fall of &#8217;98.  It seemed like a cool company with a wonderful service, but it was still a risky bet: who knew people auctioning their junk online would become a global phenomenon?<\/p>\n<p>Google is more like UPS: established, solid, recognized, respected.  Its stock probably will repay investors over time &#8212; but the wise money will be waiting to buy it at a discount.  All who get in on the IPO are guaranteed of paying full retail.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whole bunch of it at this blog. Naturally, I&#8217;m skeptical about the the company and its founders, who stand to make oodles of extra free money if the IPO price is suitably high. Yet I&#8217;m also skeptical of the skeptics:&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/2004\/05\/google-ipo-skepticism\/\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[24],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/779"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}