{"id":624,"date":"2004-03-11T10:21:15","date_gmt":"2004-03-11T10:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/?p=624"},"modified":"2004-03-11T10:21:15","modified_gmt":"2004-03-11T10:21:15","slug":"when-news-is-a-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/2004\/03\/when-news-is-a-conversation\/","title":{"rendered":"When news is a conversation&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes people have to be told to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spokesmanreview.com\/blogs\/editors\/archives\/2004\/03\/09what_happened_t.asp\">shut the hell up. <\/a><br \/>\n<P>Here&#8217;s why the Spokesman Review stopped putting reader feedback at the bottom of stories:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>First, it was very labor-intensive to gather that feedback. Once a day on weekdays, an editor had to read through each of the comments to make sure they weren&#8217;t libelous, or obscene, etc. That also meant the comments weren&#8217;t posted in a timely manner, especially comments posted from Friday through Sunday.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nSecond, a small number of readers habitually commented on numerous stories every day; it never was intended to be a platform for individual users to repeatedly air their political or social views.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nThird, many of the comments were rude and obnoxious. The intent of reader feedback was to allow for constructive criticism, offer candid commentary and\/or suggestions. Too often the comments were uncivil and pointless.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure what to think of this: Are the SpokesView folks being too anal, too unwilling to cede control?  Are they simply unwilling to put people to work making feedback work? I&#8217;ve seen plenty of moderated discussion boards that work fine as long as there&#8217;s somebody around to punish scofflaws and maintain decorum. But that takes people away from other productive jobs.<br \/>\n<P>Or are they saying  this &#8220;news is a conversation&#8221; business is a fantasy perpetuated by self-appointed Internet visionaries? <P>Could be  a little bit of all three.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes people have to be told to shut the hell up. Here&#8217;s why the Spokesman Review stopped putting reader feedback at the bottom of stories: First, it was very labor-intensive to gather that feedback. Once a day on weekdays, an&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/2004\/03\/when-news-is-a-conversation\/\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tommangan.net\/printsthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}