Safely ahead

From Paul Murray, editor of The West Australian:

  • Safe haven. What other sort of haven could there be?
  • Ahead of. A dreadful television term rapidly replacing the lovely “before” in newspapers.
  • Facilitating a hike

    Lee Anthony sent the following:

    These two really piss me off:

  • Hike” as in “tax hike” or “price hike”: I really wish taxes and prices would take a hike, but they just keep increasing.
  • Facilitate“: A ridiculous bit of public servantspeak
    that’s increasingly finding its way into news reports.
  • A few for the guillotine

    Calvin Cahan unloaded these with an eloquence
    born of bile (editor’s note: “tumbrel” is the cart the French
    used to haul people off to the guillotine; I know because I had to look
    it up): I’m strongly opposed to capital punishment, but in the case of the
    following terms, I say, “Make haste! Load them on the tumbrel!”

  • “Give back to the community“: Give what back to
    the community? What did the “community” ever actually give
    that is subject to being returned? What, in fact, is the “community”?
    How broadly should it be defined? This is a desiccated cliche that
    signifies nothing, although it does serve to point out that one of
    the chief characteristics of contemporary life is that there is precious
    little sense of community.
  • Empowered; empowerment“: A term that has been so overused and applied so indiscriminately that its initial meaning
    has been diluted to the point of extinction. For example, a politician
    who promises to “empower” a particular group just about
    ensures that the group will remain powerless.
  • Closure“: If Diogenes were alive today, he no
    doubt would be searching for closure instead of for an honest man.
    This mind-numbing, reductionist piece of psychobabble trivializes
    the richly variegated range of human feelings and emotions. Oh, how
    I fervently desire to closure the door on this noxious example of
    lexical pestilence!
  • This one is a riot

    Bob Noble, a former UPI wire editor who wants broadcasters to stop
    referring to baubles and bangles as “JOOL-er-ee” instead of
    “JOO-wel-ree” and ban the insidious “Smith’s Paint Store
    is having THEIR (instead of its) semi-annual sale,” also wants
    to toss this out:

    In cases of rioting, it seems the stories invariably have the miscreants
    throwing “rocks and bottles.” Take a walk down any
    city street, and there may be an occasional bottle, but few rocks.
    “Debris” would have probably sufficed.

    Flackery gone mad

    Mitch Wagner can hack no more of the following from public relations flacks:

  • “(Whatever) just got easier.” as in: “Cleaning
    viruses off your hard disk just got easier…”
  • “Taking (whatever) to its next level” as in: “Taking virus-scanning to its next level…”
  • Raising the bar on (whatever).” After we raise
    the bar we dance the limbo, and then we do the hokey-pokey and we
    turn ourselves about. And that’s what it’s all about, hey.
  • The company executive quote that starts, “We are proud to be
    working with XYZ Corp., an acknowledged market leader.”
    That’s a double-cliche there, “we are proud” and “market
    leader.” The executive is sometimes “excited” rather
    than proud.
  • Not exactly a day at the beach

    Karl Witter sent this voluminous list of suggestions along:

    Banned images:

  • The intrepid reporter standing at a beach’s high-water mark in the onslaught of a hurricane or other coastal storm. I’m waiting to see a wave crashing over the reporter, and, after subsiding, the
    camera op reeling in a snapped cable with no mic or reporter attached.
  • The transitional bantering in which news anchors, meteorologists and sports anchors appear on screen together for several seconds.
  • Banned words (not including spillover from the corporate lexicon):

  • “And you’re not going to believe this…”, “Get
    ready for this…”, or similar, prefacing a TV news story which
    will shock us with needlessly tragic human suffering or bureaucratic
    nincompoopery.
  • Grow” as a verb done by the subject to the object. One grows neither the economy nor a dog. One can feed a puppy, house-train it, and take it to the vet. Then it grows.
  • Random violence” isn’t; lightning is. The phrase
    seems to have been invented for contemporary street and blue-collar
    crimes, and gangs. Old-fashioned American shootouts, from the Old
    West to the Roaring Twenties, needed no such distinction for the accidental
    shooting of non-involved bystanders.
  • The mother of all…” is this decade’s mother
    of all cliches.
  • Abortion clinic,” “abortion doctor“. Hmm…nobody’s called John Salvi’s victims “abortion receptionists” yet. Hey, I’m just glad the press hasn’t adapted the right-to-lifers’ terminology and started calling women’s health clinics “fetus
    farms”! (Half-kidding but barely.)
  • xxx-ly correct” when one really means “just
    plain accurate and right.” Included uses of note are geographically
    correct, historically correct, and, the winning stretch-of-phrase,
    orinthologically correct.
  • Politically correct” applied ex-post-facto to
    anything. Someday a journalist will describe the Underground Railroad,
    the Pure Food and Drug Act, or the Taylor Act as “P.C.”
    Actually, “politically correct” is a “feely” word
    with no definition anymore. Restrain its use to the original higher-education
    meaning and trash it in other arenas.
  • Oscar, meet the grouch

    In honor of Oscar Night (March 24, 1997), Craig Sonnenberg nominates
    for banishment:

  • The feel-good movie of the year.”
  • So-and-So…”delivers the performance of his/her career
  • So-and-So “gives a triumphant performance that is sure to
    be remembered at Oscar time
    .”
  • Other banishment nominations:

  • Reporters pronouncing the word “nuclear” as “nucular”
  • “There’s more bad news today for (The White House, O.J.
    Simpson, Timothy McVeigh’s defense team, whoever)…”
  • “The latest (CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, USA Today, NY
    Times, Gallup, etc.) poll is out, and it’s not good news
    for
    (President Clinton, Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich, The First Lady,
    etc.)
  • Wonk on the head

    Kim Welch suggests these words/phrases:

  • wonk (as in policy wonk, as in virtually every story on Clinton appointees and hires).
  • mosh pit (enough already).
  • virtually (see above); virtual reality (seriously overused)
  • paradigm shift (gag).
  • His line in the sand

    Doug Allaire offers these two candidates, mostly heard on
    TV:

  • “So-and-so has drawn a line in the sand.…” I
    think this one started showing up more after George Bush actually
    said it before the Gulf War. Now I can just about hear someone on
    a Sunday morning talkfest saying, “The Republicans have drawn
    a line in the sand on this issue.” It always reminds me of drawing
    lines in the sand at the beach and watching the rising tide wash them
    away. Maybe the phrase isn’t as meaningless as I thought, after all.
  • Using individuals as if they were groups: “The Yankees have
    had a lot of strong players, your Babe Ruths, your Joe DiMaggios, your Mickey Mantles….”